New Delhi: The Supreme Court Monday said with the advancement of technology and artificial intelligence, economic offences such as money laundering have become a real threat to the functioning of the financial system of the country.
A bench comprising justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi said: “with the advancement of technology and Artificial Intelligence, the economic offences like money laundering have become a real threat to the functioning of the financial system of the country and have become a great challenge for the investigating agencies to detect and comprehend the intricate nature of transactions, as also the role of the persons involved therein”.
The bench said a lot of minute exercise is expected to be undertaken by the investigating agency to see that no innocent person is wrongly booked and that no culprit escapes from the clutches of the law. The apex court made these observations while dismissing the bail plea of an employee of Shakti Bhog Foods Limited in a money laundering case.
The bench said the economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the matter of bail and economic offences having deep-rooted conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds need to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby posing serious threat to the financial health of the country. “Undoubtedly, economic offences have serious repercussions on the development of the country as a whole”, said the bench.
The top court said when the detention of the accused is continued by the court, the courts are also expected to conclude the trials within a reasonable time, further ensuring the right of speedy trial guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. The apex court said the accused, Tarun Kumar, has to prima facie prove that he is not guilty of the alleged offence and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
The apex court said it may be noted that the appellant has not been able to overcome the threshold stipulations contemplated in Section 45 namely he has failed to prima facie prove that he is not guilty of the alleged offence and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. “It cannot be gainsaid that the burden of proof lies on the accused for the purpose of the condition set out in the Section 45 that he is not guilty of such offence. Of course, such discharge of burden could be on the probabilities, nonetheless in the instant case there being sufficient material on record adduced by the respondent showing the thick involvement of the appellant in the alleged offence of money laundering under Section 3 of the said Act, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the appellant”, said the bench.
The money laundering case, registered by ED, against Shakti Bhog Foods Limited is based on a CBI FIR, which charged it and others with criminal conspiracy, cheating and criminal misconduct. The case was registered against the company and its promoters came after SBI registered a complaint against the company.
