ETV Bharat / state

SC to deliver verdict on pleas of disqualified Karnataka MLAs today

author img

By

Published : Nov 13, 2019, 12:01 AM IST

SC to deliver verdict on November 13 on pleas of disqualified Karnataka MLAs

The Supreme Court will pronounce judgment on Wednesday to the petitions filed by 17 rebel MLAs of Karnataka assembly challenging their disqualification. A three-judge bench of justices N V Ramana, Sanjiv Khanna and Krishna Murari had on October 25 reserved its verdict on the petitions filed by these disqualified MLAs. Kumar had disqualified these 17 MLAs of ruling the Congress-JD(S) coalition ahead of a trust vote in July.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court is scheduled to pronounce on November 13 its verdict on the pleas of 17 disqualified Congress-JD (S) MLAs of Karnataka challenging the orders of the then Assembly Speaker K R Ramesh Kumar to disqualify them.

A three-judge bench of justices N V Ramana, Sanjiv Khanna and Krishna Murari had on October 25 reserved its verdict on the petitions filed by these disqualified MLAs. Kumar had disqualified these 17 MLAs of ruling the Congress-JD(S) coalition ahead of a trust vote in July.

Timeline of Karnataka Political Crisis
Timeline of Karnataka Political Crisis

The then chief minister H D Kumaraswamy had resigned after losing the trust vote, which paved the way for the BJP-led government in the state under BS Yediyurappa.

By-polls to 15 out of these 17 assembly seats which fell vacant following the disqualification of MLAs are scheduled on December 5 and candidates are required to file their nomination papers between November 11 and November 18.

These disqualified MLAs have recently approached the apex court seeking a direction to the Election Commission to postpone the assembly by-polls for these 15 seats till the pronouncement of verdict in the matter.

Some of these disqualified MLAs had argued in the apex court that they have an “indefeasible right” to resign as members of the assembly and the decision by the then Speaker to disqualify them smacks of “vengeance” and “mala fide”.

During the arguments in the matter, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the Karnataka Congress, had contended that the then Speaker, who was the master of the Assembly, had exercised his jurisdiction to disqualify these MLAs and his decision cannot be questioned.

Sibal had also submitted that “the matter needs to be referred to a Constitution bench as it raises matters of grave constitutional importance”.

The incumbent Karnataka Assembly Speaker had earlier told the top court that he has no difficulty in hearing these 17 MLAs and take a “fresh call” on the issue.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the office of the Karnataka Assembly Speaker, had submitted that under the scheme of Constitution, a lawmaker has a right to resign and the Speaker should accept it. The current Assembly Speaker is V Hegde Kageri.

Key Arguments

On Wednesday, the impending decision is expected to rule for the disqualified MLAs.

On Wednesday, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi will appear for the disqualified MLAs, advanced a three-fold argument on behalf of the rebel MLAs.

One, that the members have an indefeasible right to resign and hence, the resignations should have been accepted immediately.

Two, that there was no material for disqualification, considering that they were given only 3 days to dispute it, as against the mandate of a minimum of 7 days under the Karnataka Assembly Rules.

And three, that even if the disqualification is assumed to be valid, it will be valid only until the fresh elections.

Also Read: 35 candidates file nominations so far for Dec 5 K'taka bypolls

Intro:Body:Conclusion:
ETV Bharat Logo

Copyright © 2024 Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., All Rights Reserved.