ETV Bharat / state

Against Constitution, Will Go To Supreme Court: Activists, Opposition, As BJP Push For Disturbed Area Bill In Rajasthan

As any area declared 'disturbed' will see land prices fall, so that favoured builders can purchase properties at throwaway rates, says Waqf Board Chairman.

Rajasthan Assembly
Rajasthan Assembly (ETV Bharat)
author img

By ETV Bharat English Team

Published : March 4, 2026 at 5:06 PM IST

3 Min Read
Choose ETV Bharat

Jaipur: The Rajasthan government is preparing to pass the Disturbed Areas Bill, which was recently approved by the Cabinet, in the current Budget session. On March 6, the Bhajan Lal government will table the Disturbed Areas Bill in the House, following which, it will be discussed by members of both the ruling and opposition parties. Thereafter, the government will make every effort to pass the Bill.

The Congress party has been continuously attacking the Bill, with Leader of the Opposition (LoP) Tikaram Julie, Govind Singh Dotasara, and several other leaders criticising it. Stating that the Bill is unacceptable, they have vowed to strongly oppose it during the House debate.

Even before the Bill was tabled, several social and religious organisations launched a campaign against it, calling it against the Constitution and fundamental rights, and threatening to approach the Supreme Court if necessary.

Regarding the Bill, State President of the Congress Minority Department M D Chowdhary said even if the government manages to pass the Bill using its majority in the House, it still completely violates the spirit of the Constitution, which guarantees equality and fundamental rights. He questioned how the government could declare any area "disturbed", saying, "We will examine the Bill to see what provisions and rules have been included, and after consulting with our legal team, take the matter to the Supreme Court if necessary."

He added that the current government had previously introduced an anti-conversion law, which they have also appealed against in the Supreme Court, and whose hearing will take place soon. He also said, "This government only wants to further its political interests by creating a Hindu-Muslim divide. The government's first priority should be employment, education, and health."

Mohammad Nazim, state president of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, said the Disturbed Areas Bill is against the Constitution and violates fundamental rights. He said that instead of fostering brotherhood and harmony in society, it will create distance, which will prove fatal in the future. Any area declared "disturbed" will face a halt in development work, and the people living there will be looked down upon by others, he added.

He also stated that the BJP government only seeks to play politics by polarising and dividing Hindus and Muslims, which is not right. He said, "The people elected the government, not the other way around. Therefore, the government should discard its discriminatory policies and, instead of enacting such laws, explore alternative solutions to issues facing the public."

Nazim also stated that he will examine the provisions of the Bill in detail to pinpoint how it violates people's fundamental rights, and then approach the courts.

Regarding the Bill, Rajasthan Waqf Board Chairman Khanu Khan Budhwali said it not only violates constitutional rights, but also gives a few industrialists and builders the right to take over the property of poor and lower-class people. He said, "Because any area declared 'disturbed' will see land prices fall, builders will purchase properties there at throwaway rates."

Social activist Nisha Sidhu said there is no place for bias and discrimination in the Constitution, but the BJP government is pursuing a biased and discriminatory policy. The Disturbed Areas Bill is an example of this.

She said, "First, the government introduced the anti-conversion law, and now it is going to introduce the Disturbed Areas Bill. It is possible that on the basis of its majority, the government may get it passed, but the people of Rajasthan will not accept such a law."