Rajya Sabha Approves Bill To Increase Number Of Judges In Supreme Court
Arjun Ram Meghwal said the increase in judges in the Supreme Court is a step to improve judicial efficiency.
By PTI
Published : August 5, 2026 at 5:13 PM IST
|Updated : August 5, 2026 at 8:49 PM IST
New Delhi: The Rajya Sabha on Wednesday passed a bill to increase the number of judges of the Supreme Court from the present 33 to 37 (excluding the Chief Justice) with a voice vote with Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal asserting that the government is committed to independence of the judiciary.
The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, was passed by a voice vote after a brief discussion in the Upper House, while Opposition members staged a walkout. The bill, which will replace an ordinance, has already been approved by the Lok Sabha on August 3. Being a Money Bill, the Upper House returned it to the Lok Sabha.
Replying to the debate, Meghwal, who is the Minister of State for Law and Justice, said the increase in the sanctioned strength is part of the government's judicial reforms aimed at improving access to justice and reducing the backlog of cases.
He said the judiciary has witnessed a steady rise in case filings, necessitating an expansion in judicial capacity. "A structural shift is needed to be adopted in the Supreme Court, where a need is felt to establish at least one permanent constitutional bench and two or three dedicated three-judge benches," he said.
Meghwal said questions are raised on the government for going through the ordinance route to expand the number of judges at the apex court. Replying to that, the minister said the Chief Justice, through a letter, informed the Prime Minister on May 11 about the rise in number of daily case filings.
"He (CJI) said there is a gap of 10,000 cases per year. He said that 75,410 cases were filed and a fresh 46,988 cases were instituted. It has become necessary to have a higher daily disposal rate at the admission stage. This will only be possible when the number of judges in the Supreme Court increases," said Meghwal.
CJI had also mentioned that when the constitutional benches are established, for example, the case of Sabarimala is being heard by a nine-judge bench, the number of judges is reduced in the regular benches.
"Due to the establishment of the constitutional benches, the number of judges is reduced in the regular cases," he said adding, "the long sitting of larger benches leads to reduction in the strength of regular benches, which contributes to pendency. Therefore, increasing the number of judges has become necessary."
Meghwal said over the years, governments have taken steps to increase the number of judges. When the Supreme Court started functioning in 1950 it had eight judges, including the Chief Justice. Its strength has been increased from time to time in line with the growing workload.
He also said the recent increase in number of judges has already enabled the formation of dedicated benches to hear the oldest civil and criminal matters, freeing them from routine miscellaneous work and helping expedite disposal of long-pending cases.
Meghwal said though disposing of prolonged cases is the exclusive domain of the judiciary, according to Article 21 of the Constitution, the central government is obliged to facilitate, and this amendment is in this direction.
"As soon as this ordinance came, on June 1, 2026, five new judges of the Supreme Court were appointed," he said, adding as per the new roster notification of the Supreme Court, four such specific benches were formed which will exclusively hear the old legacy civil and criminal matters.
Addressing concerns over representation of women in the higher judiciary, Meghwal said the country is likely to see its first woman Chief Justice of India soon and noted that four high courts, those of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Meghalaya and Patna, had women chief justices.
Over judicial infrastructure, he said the government has sanctioned Rs 795.53 crore for expansion of the Supreme Court complex, including construction of 28 courtrooms, nine Constitution court halls and 42 judges' chambers.
"The judiciary is an independent organ of governance, and the government is fully committed to judicial independence. Our effort is to provide judges a conducive environment so that justice reaches citizens in the best possible manner," Meghwal said.
On appointments to the higher judiciary, he said this involves a continuous consultation and collaboration process between the judiciary and the executive. He said appointments to the Supreme Court and High Courts are made under Articles 124 and 217 of the Constitution, respectively, and are governed by the Memorandum of Procedure evolved through judicial pronouncements.
Referring to demands for a southern bench of the Supreme Court, Meghwal said the apex court has so far not agreed to the proposal, though consultations on the issue continue.
Over the district courts, he said filling the vacant position in the subordinate court is in the domain of the high court and the state government concerned. He said more than 64 lakh cases are pending in high courts and about 4.98 crore cases in district courts across the country, underlining the need for sustained reforms and capacity enhancement in the judicial system.
However, he also added that in 2014, the judge to population ratio was 16.11 per million population, which has now increased to 22.33 per million. The minister also highlighted the government's focus on digital transformation of the justice delivery system. He said over Rs 7,210 crore has been allocated for the e-Courts project to strengthen technology-driven judicial services.
Read More
